Modernizing Legacy Software Means Modernizing the SDLC
by Dmitri Kaznachey Large language models (LLMs) offer a compelling way to accelerate the modernization of complex legacy systems.
Organizations are getting too little value from analytics for a variety of reasons. Primary reasons include 1) a proper data and analytics foundation not in place before making large investments in analytics, 2) staff lacking required analytical skills, and 3) the organization having inadequate analytics processes. These reasons are discussed in greater detail below.
A large government agency invested in Tableau licenses, but very few people were using them because no one actually knew how to use Tableau. Investing in a training program and then broadly communicating the opportunity would have resulted in more people knowing how to use the newly available software and would have achieved better results.
Organizations provide analytics staff with tools and data, but they do not always provide the support and training necessary to use the tools effectively. The result is that staff revert to the less advanced tools they are comfortable using. Additionally, the analytics staff may not know the ins and outs of the business—especially when compared to non-technical staff—while the non-technical staff and executives are usually not analytics-literate, which can result in a breakdown in communication between the various parties. All of this makes it hard—if not impossible—for the organization to fully realize the potential of analytics.
The analytics used to make decisions are typically not located where decisions are made—that is, analytics are not embedded in an organization’s day-to-day workstreams. There can also be a lack of transparency and communication around the data and processes used to generate the analytics results. These together lead to decision-makers who do not understand, trust, and subsequently do not rely on the analytics output, which results in wasted resources and reductions in employee morale. For organizations to get the most out of their analytics investments, insights should be integrated into workstreams, tailored to the business user, and produced by transparent and trustworthy processes.
There are multiple initiatives that an organization can undertake to ensure they are receiving the greatest value from their analytics. Some of these initiatives include 1) creating an analytics center of excellence (CoE), 2) performing an analytics maturity assessment, 3) implementing a data strategy initiative, and 4) investing in embedded and self-service analytics capabilities. An overview of these initiatives follows.
An Analytics CoE can take many forms. The most effective is an internal team that promotes, develops, and evolves analytics to better achieve the organization’s objectives. The CoE should be a permanent team with well-defined roles and responsibilities. CoE responsibilities would include improving technical and non-technical staff’s analytics capabilities, implementing organization-wide standards to improve processes and increase transparency, setting analytics strategy, and promoting analytics across the organization.
An analytics maturity assessment is an organizational assessment that utilizes an analytics maturity model to evaluate where an organization is at in terms of analytics maturity. The assessment should determine the organization’s current analytics maturity and identify areas that could benefit from analytics. The assessment should also outline the steps required to achieve the desired level of maturity.
As defined by Gartner [3], data strategy is a “highly dynamic process employed to support the acquisition, organization, analysis, and delivery of data in support of business objectives.” A data strategy initiative aims to establish standard processes and practices that improve an organization’s ability to manage, transform, and share data in a repeatable manner. Therefore, implementing a data strategy initiative is essential to laying the needed data foundation for advanced analytics.
Embedded analytics is when advanced analytics are directly integrated into enterprise applications. In contrast, self-service analytics is a form of analytics where line-of-business staff can perform queries and generate reports independently. The primary goal of both of these initiatives is to make it easier for business users to use analytics results and make better decisions for the organization. The most efficient way to accomplish this goal is to integrate analytics directly into employee workstreams or give non-technical staff the ability to dig into the organization’s data and generate insights on their own.
While every organization is different, most organizations should start by creating an analytics CoE. The analytics CoE would be responsible for the entire analytics lifecycle. The CoE would be instrumental in achieving value, given that one of the primary goals of the CoE is to maximize the value that results from investing in analytics.
The next step is to perform an analytics maturity assessment. The analytics maturity assessment will help the organization gain a better understanding of where they are, where they want to be, and what needs to be done to get there. In other words, the assessment will help the organization gain a clearer vision of what needs to be done to get the most value out of their analytics.
The third step is to implement a data strategy initiative. The CoE would design the initiative to give the organization the data foundation needed to be successful. The initiative will also help the organization avoid wasting large sums of money due to poor data quality [4].
The last step is the realization of value through embedded and self-service analytics. This step is when the results of analytics are used to drive organizational decisions that—in turn—result in the value creation.
It is important to note that the work does not end here. Organizations must continue to refine and improve their analytical capabilities to stay ahead of the competition and continue creating value. Once these four initial steps are complete, organizations can engage in even more advanced analytics initiatives to create even greater value.
Organizations often take the wrong strategy when it comes to data and analytics. Many organizations will start by putting out a press release that announces that the organization is becoming data-driven. Then the organization will invest heavily in cloud-based “big data” technologies, purchase licenses for a data visualization tool, and hire a large team of highly paid data scientists with backgrounds in machine learning, AI, and natural language processing. The problem with this approach is that a proper data and analytics foundation has not been laid down. There is no ongoing education program to help staff gain necessary skills, and analytics processes are inefficient and burdensome. The result is a destruction of value, rather than value creation. Laying the proper analytics foundation first will help your organization avoid making costly mistakes and will help you get the most value out of your analytics initiatives. It will also help put your organization on the right track to becoming a top-tier analytics competitor.
References: